Legal Consequence of court decision: Parents Relinquish Custody Due to Opposition to 14-Year-Old’s Gender Transition

In the heart of Montana, a family is grappling with the loss of custody of their 14-year-old child, sparking controversy over their opposition to the teen’s desire for a gender transition. Todd Kolstad and stepmother Krista found themselves in the midst of a heated dispute with the state’s Child and Family Services (CFS), leading to a public outcry as they assert that their family has been “destroyed” and their parental rights “trampled.”

The saga began when officials from CFS received a distressing call in August 2023. Jennifer, the 14-year-old in question (whose name has been changed for privacy), had reportedly expressed suicidal thoughts at school. This prompted a CFS caseworker to visit the family home and engage with Jennifer, examining the environment after she claimed to have ingested harmful substances. However, subsequent tests at the hospital revealed no signs of toxin consumption.

During Jennifer’s hospital stay, staff observed her identification as male and preference to be addressed as Leo. This revelation intensified the conflict, as Todd and Krista vehemently objected to any consideration of a gender transition. Alleging consistent undermining by the hospital and CFS, Krista expressed frustration, stating, “We were very clear…that this goes against our values, morals, and our religious beliefs.”

Despite the parents’ objections, Jennifer was moved to a specialized residential care facility in Wyoming. Concerned about the provision of gender-affirming care without parental consent in the state, Todd and Krista protested, leading to a confrontation. The parents claim that CFS served them papers at home, alleging their inability or refusal to provide medical care, a charge they vehemently deny.

Jennifer’s subsequent return to a Montana youth facility in September did not alleviate the tension. Earlier this month, a court decision placed the teen under the custody of CFS for a period of six months. The Kolstads assert that the court’s reasoning was rooted in their reluctance to endorse Jennifer’s desire to transition, asserting that it was deemed to be in her “therapeutic best interest.”

In response to the escalating situation, Governor Greg Gianforte’s office conducted a review and aligned with the stance of CFS workers. The governor, in a series of social media posts, stated that the state policy and laws were followed in handling this “tragic case.” Lieutenant Governor Kristen Juras, an experienced attorney, corroborated this assessment after examining case documents and consulting with the director of the Department of Public Health and Human Services (DPHHS).

Gianforte reassured the public that Juras would continue to monitor the case closely. Responding to concerns, the governor’s office emphasized that the state does not remove minors from homes to facilitate gender transition services or use public funds for such services while a minor is in custody.

In an effort to address the broader issue, Governor Gianforte has directed the Department of Public Health and Human Services to formulate a formal policy or develop regulations to clarify that a parent’s right to refuse gender transition services does not constitute abuse or neglect as defined by the state.

As this complex and emotionally charged case unfolds, the family remains deeply affected, with their pleas for the well-being of Jennifer echoing through the corridors of public opinion. The legal and ethical dimensions of parental rights, child welfare, and gender identity continue to fuel the debate surrounding this tragic situation in Montana.

Recent Articles


Related Stories

Leave A Reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay on op - Ge the daily news in your inbox